Advantages: + Fuel gauge + Good heating power + Price is ok + Quality in relation to price is also ok. + Does not make a windy or cheap impression. • Disadvantages: - It is bad to fix. In the beginning you have to turn the wick quite high and light it at 2 to 3 places. The warmer the stove gets, the further you have to go down again. The problem here is that you can not tell when you've set it down so far that the oven will go out. \ R \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r This is a handle, with which the burner but can only balance very bad. After lighting, the burner must be replaced. If this does not work out right, it will ruffle and stink neatly. \ R \ n \ r \ nNeutral note that did not flow into the rating: \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ n \ r \ nWhoever buys such a stove, must remember that the operation is expensive. I use it transitionally to sporadic heating when working for a particular expansion project. Later it will be kept ready as an emergency oven. For permanent heating in my opinion kerosene is much too expensive (usually around the 4, - € per liter, if you get it cheap also times 2, - to 3, - Euro).